°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ

 

 

 

Hutch Neilson: SOFE's focus is fusion engineering. Fusion engineers have the crucial task of producing the components and systems needed to advance fusion physics and technology. Progress toward fusion energy systems, both magnetic and inertial, can be measured by the advances in the degree of system integration in fusion research facilities. Today's fusion engineers confront the challenges of large, industrial scale facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) and °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ. They use advanced technology to obtain self-consistent solutions to demanding physics requirements, integrating large numbers of components on an unprecedented scale. SOFE attracts leaders from the international fusion research community, providing a venue for a multilateral exchange of information among physicists, technologists, and engineers.  The first symposium, held in 1965 in Livermore, CA, was called "Symposium on Engineering Problems of Controlled Thermonuclear Research." Years ago the name was simplified to "Symposium on Fusion Engineering" and today the series coverage has expanded to include such topics as project management and system integration. But, the focus is still very much on fusion's challenging engineering problems and their solutions.

 

 

The completion of NIF and °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ's transition fromdesign to construction mark a transition to a new phase of the world fusion enterprise, in which the focus is increasingly on the final steps to fusion's energy goals. SOFE-2013 will advance the international technical discussion concerning the engineering of current projects including NIF and °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ, but also of next-step programs and facilities on the roadmap to the realization of fusion. Participants will have the opportunity to tour the National Ignition Facility. The symposium will feature plenary talks from China, South Korea, and the European Union, discussing ambitious plans, including new fusion nuclear facilities, aimed at fusion electricity generation by mid-century. °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ will be prominently featured in several of the fifty or so invited papers, as well as in plenary talks by the 2011 Fusion Technology awardee and °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ Deputy Director-General Remmelt Haange and by Deputy Director-General Carlos Alejaldre. Invited papers from several operating tokamaks and stellarators will emphasize their accomplishments and plans in support of fusion next steps.

 

 

Yes, much has happened in this regard since SOFE-2011. For a few examples, the European Fusion Development Agreement has rolled out a roadmap calling for a demonstration fusion power plant to start operation in the early 2040s with the goal of demonstrating net electricity by 2050. China and South Korea are both studying design options for next-step fusion nuclear devices, and are making plans to start construction in the 2020s. And, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has launched an annual DEMO Programme Workshop series to foster international collaboration and broaden the international technical discussion on DEMO technical issues. The first of these workshops was held at UCLA in October 2012.

 

 

Establishing roadmaps and starting to design DEMO facilities, as some countries have done, is a good start. The next step is to carry out the critical DEMO-focused R&D programs needed to establish the technical basis for these projects. Heat exhaust, materials properties under fusion neutron irradiation, and tritium self-sufficiency are among the technical challenges for which R&D is needed to develop practical solutions. Most importantly, all agree that successful construction and exploitation of °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ is mandatory, not only to understand the properties and control of a burning plasma, but to establish fusion's ability to successfully carry out such a large-scale project. International collaboration was crucial in establishing the °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ Project and, in my view, will continue to be indispensable for successfully completing the °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ mission and the remaining steps to DEMO. Going forward, we will continue to experiment to find the best among the many possible models for international collaboration.

 

 

I have a mixed response to that question. Fusion can take credit for a long list of accomplishments in that period, but I would single out the start of °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ construction as a sort of crowning achievement. Before we could take that step, we had to establish °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ's technical basis (both physics and technology), organize an international enterprise, develop a self-consistent design and schedule, and initiate work through Procurement Arrangements and, finally, contracts. Those accumulated accomplishments have taken fusion across the threshold to a new DEMO-focused era, in which succeeding with °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ will be our first task. But, I have to say that we haven't progressed as rapidly as we foresaw 40 years ago, partly because the technical challenges have proved to be greater than we estimated and partly because for many years the resources were not available to take the large steps needed to accelerate progress. Now, though, with large international commitment to the °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ Project, we have the opportunity to tackle some of our biggest challenges. Our community needs to deliver on °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ's promise as rapidly as possible, and thereby make the case for continued support for solving fusion's remaining challenges. I am confident that we will do that.

 

 

Broadly speaking, yes. I think fusion's potential is broadly understood by the public and policy makers, but there is also a generally correct appreciation of the uncertainties, risks, and costs attendant with fusion research. Support for fusion research competes with other public imperatives. Fusion's priority is not always as high as we fusion researchers might wish, but the sustained support we've had over several decades and now, the commitment to °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ, indicates that its importance is broadly understood and the glass is at least half full. That said, there are plenty of misconceptions out there, and it behoves fusion researchers to be relentless in their efforts to constantly explain, educate, and deliver a balanced message about fusion's potential to the public.