°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ

 

The objective of the Fusion Power Coordinating Committee is to stimulate and rationalize R&D activities in fusion science and technology with an eye to the long term. The goal is the realization of fusion energy; the method is a step-by-step approach based on coordinated research activities that can be device-specific or cross-cutting. The Committee initiates, or promotes, R&D and cooperative experiments among participating IEA members and partner countries internationally.

 

Under the FPCC umbrella, for example, experiments are conducted on tokamak devices worldwide and the results are compared. This type of scaling activity is extremely valuable; in fact, it was just this type of coordinated experimentation that contributed to the dimensioning of °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ. We are continuing in this direction to support the °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ program and to plan in parallel for the steps after °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ. We don't just exchange words, but also hardware, people, and scientific results.

 

Why hold this year's meeting at °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ Headquarters?
 
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ is a key device on the road to fusion energy and the Fusion Power Coordinating Committee is marshalling fusion community resources to contribute to its success. Our role is to identify the most urgent °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ needs in terms of scientific or technological issues and see how we can support their resolution. For this, we have a tool¡ªthe IEA Technology Collaboration Programmes.

 

Technology Collaboration Programmes operate in different areas of IEA activity. As part of the fusion portfolio there are Programmes in eight areas: tokamak cooperation; the environmental, safety and economic aspects of fusion power; materials, fusion reactor technology; plasma-wall interactions; reversed field pinch devices; spherical tori; and the stellarator-heliotron concept. The FPCC manages these Programmes.

 

 

 

It's true that the ITPA is also a framework for internationally coordinated fusion research activities, but it focuses on science issues only. There can be overlap between the areas of focus, but we are careful to make sure there is no duplication.  You'll find that a good number of top scientists participate in both activities and that there is excellent understanding between the two groups.

There is one other major difference. Participants to the FPCC Technology Collaboration Programmes actually sign formal Implementing Agreements, which establish a contractual relationship between at least two IEA member countries or contracting parties. These agreements are multilateral technology collaboration mechanisms that permit the exchange of material, the exchange of personnel, and joint experimentation.

 

 

The level of cooperation around fusion issues is quite remarkable, and it is widening. It's no exaggeration to say that the world community around fusion is expanding. Originally, participation in IEA Technology Collaboration Programmes was limited to OECD nations, but the enlargement of membership is now encouraged. We have been joined by Costa Rica and Australia, as well as non-IEA countries like China, India and Russia.

 

 

The chairs of most Technology Collaboration Programmes were present at our most recent meeting, as well as a delegation of °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ scientists and other representatives of the members¡ªabout 30 people in all. The °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ Director-General also participated actively through a number of presentations, including one in which he identified the top °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê¸ßÊÖ R&D needs. We then made detailed proposals for joint collaboration.

 

My role as Chair will now be to report to the Committee on Energy Research and Technology (CERT), which oversees technology forecasting and analyses, and the research, development, demonstration and deployment strategies for the IEA. Throughout the year I will keep in close contact with the Technology Collaboration Programme chairs to see how implementation is proceeding.